Global Exchange fair trade store press room search
Programs in the Americas
get involved  
travel with reality tours  
update  
travel with reality tours  
regions  
Africa   
Americas   
Argentina   
Bolivia   
Brazil   
Colombia   
Costa Rica   
Cuba   
Ecuador   
Guatemala   
Haiti   
Honduras   
Jamaica   
Mexico 
Nicaragua   
Peru   
United States   
Venezuela   
Asia   
Middle East & Central Asia   
Europe   
What's New  

Trade pact blasted at forum in Reading

Poverty increased, corporations profited and jobs were lost, boosting immigration to the U.S. after the North American Free Trade Agreement, three speakers say.

Reading Eagle
March 05, 2008
Erin Negley
Reading, PA - The North American Free Trade Agreement was supposed to reduce trade barriers among Mexico, the U.S. and Canada, increase good-paying jobs and improve quality of life.

Instead, poverty increased, corporations profited and jobs were lost, boosting immigration to the U.S, three speakers said Tuesday at a program in Reading about the effects of NAFTA.

Phila Back, an organizer for Working Families Win, a pro-labor advocacy group, invited the speakers to Reading to make people more aware of NAFTA and its effects on immigration.

"Reading has been affected so heavily by job loss due to NAFTA and other NAFTA-like trade agreements," she said. "NAFTA is driving immigration. It's increasing poverty in Mexico dramatically. Meanwhile, Reading has lost 12,000 good jobs since 2000. So Reading is the perfect intersection of these two."

More than 20 people attended the presentation at the Center for the American Dream in downtown Reading.

Since NAFTA was passed in 1993, laws and regulations in the three countries have been challenged by secret trade tribunals and that's not right, Back said.

Migration from Mexico to the U.S. drastically increased after NAFTA was enacted, said Hector E. Sanchez, Mexico Policy Education Coordinator for Global Exchange, an international human rights organization.

"There have been factories that have moved operations to Mexico, but not enough to make up for the plants, factories and workplaces that have shut down in Mexico," said Miguel Pickard, a researcher for the Center for Economic and Political Investigation for Community Action, a research organization based in Chiapas, Mexico.

NAFTA abolished Mexican trade protections that required foreign companies to hire Mexican workers, reinvest a portion of profits back into the country and buy some materials made in Mexico. Ending those regulations caused a ripple effect on the Mexican economy, causing migration to the U.S., Pickard said.

Carleen Pickard, an organizer for public advocacy organization Council of Canadians, warned about the security and prosperity partnership, a joint economic venture among the leaders of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico. She isn't related to Miguel Pickard.

When the partnership takes action, legislators aren't involved, she said.

It's one more way corporations will try to privatize things such as Canada's health care system or sell bulk amounts of Canadian water, Carleen Pickard said.

The audience members shouldn't give up hope, the speakers said. They can take action and made a difference.

People can push for new trade policies that protect workers and the environment. They can ask presidential candidates about their stands on trade issues and urge politicians to start talking about making NAFTA better.


 Become a Member
 Get our eNewsletter

Printer-friendly version
Email to a friend

This page last updated March 12, 2008
Global Exchange | Search | Fair Trade Store | About Us | Contact Us
Become a Member | Get our eNewsletter | Take Action Now
Get Involved | What's New | Travel with Reality Tours
The Global Economy | War, Peace & Democracy | Programs by Region
© Global Exchange 2007
2017 Mission Street, 2nd Floor - San Francisco, CA 94110
t: 415.255.7296 f: 415.255.7498